by Pam Martens and Russ Martens, Wall St On Parade:

Last Monday, Robert J. Cleary of law firm Patterson Belknap filed a motion in the bankruptcy proceeding of Sam Bankman-Fried’s collapsed fraud, the FTX crypto exchange, seeking to launch three new investigations into legal work done by Sullivan & Cromwell for Bankman-Fried and FTX prior to the collapse of the fraud.

Cleary is the independent examiner appointed by the U.S. Department of Justice’s U.S. Trustee, which acts as a watchdog in federal bankruptcy cases. Adding to the embarrassment for Sullivan & Cromwell with the announcement of the new investigations is the fact that Sullivan & Cromwell fought against allowing the U.S. Trustee to appoint an independent examiner after it had maneuvered itself into the position of lead counsel to the FTX bankruptcy proceeding, despite its multitude of conflicts with FTX. The presiding judge in the bankruptcy case, John Dorsey, had sided with Sullivan & Cromwell in the matter.

TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

The U.S. Trustee was forced to take the issue to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. On January 19, a sharp rebuke to Sullivan & Cromwell and the judge was handed down. The court wrote in its decision:

“Under the Bankruptcy Court’s interpretation, the appointment of an examiner under either subsection of Section 1104(c) would be subject to a court’s discretion and a judge would have the final say as to whether an investigation was warranted. But this interpretation runs counter to the statute’s plain language and established canons of construction.”

The court added this:

“First, an examiner must be ‘disinterested’… This requirement of disinterest is particularly salient here, where issues of potential conflicts of interest arising from debtor’s counsel serving as pre-petition advisors to FTX have been raised repeatedly….”

The independent examiner’s June 10 motion explains the three new areas it wants to investigate as follows:

“The first recommendation concerns S&C’s representation of Sam Bankman-Fried… in connection with his purchase of the Robinhood Shares…This inquiry would focus on (1) the scope and contours of that representation, and (2) based on that representation, what, if anything, S&C knew or should have known about the FTX Group’s misconduct and/or fraud…

“The second recommendation concerns potential claims against the former shareholders of Ledger Holdings, Inc [parent of LedgerX]…that sold their interests prepetition to West Realm Shires Inc. [a/k/a FTX.US]…This inquiry would (1) seek to determine whether an avoidance action(s) is warranted with respect to unreleased shareholders, and (2) enable the Examiner to report on the underlying details of the prepetition sale of LHI to WRS, which report and findings would be in the public interest…

“The third recommendation concerns the ‘holes’ or balance sheet shortfalls at FTX.US…This inquiry would center on (1) the existence of and the reasons these holes arose at FTX.US, (2) whether the balance sheet holes were the result of commingling of customer or corporate assets, (3) the frequency and magnitude of the holes, and (4) how they were resolved and by whom….”

The independent examiner is asking for 10 weeks and $3 million to conduct the three new investigations. A hearing on the matter is scheduled for today in the federal bankruptcy court in Delaware before Judge John Dorsey.

The independent examiner had released a preliminary report on May 23, which found no wrongdoing on the part of Sullivan & Cromwell. That report, however, indicated that further investigations would be requested by the independent examiner.

Adding pressure on the independent examiner is the fact that powerful sleuthing into Sullivan & Cromwell’s work on behalf of FTX is being done by law firms representing plaintiffs who are suing Sullivan & Cromwell (S&C) in federal district court in Florida. The plaintiffs write in their complaint:

Read More @ WallStOnParade.com